EU: More powers for Europol: what does your government think?

Topic
Country/Region
EU

Proposals published in December could vastly increase the powers of EU policing agency Europol, in particular by granting it new data-processing powers, a role in developing algorithms and new technologies for the police, and by easing cooperation with non-EU states. EU member states have been discussing the proposals since January. To facilitate democratic engagement and scrutiny, Statewatch is publishing internal Council documents that set out the member states' comments on the proposals so far.

Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

The comments set out in the table below are contained in a mammoth document that was circulated to national delegations in the Council on 5 March: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2016/794, as regards Europol’s cooperation with private parties, the processing of personal data by Europol in support of criminal investigations, and Europol’s role on research and innovation - Written comments (Council document 5527/4/21 REV 4, pdf)

It is noteworthy that two of the Commission's proposals - giving Europol a greater degree of influence over when national police forces should launch a criminal investigation (and thus impinging upon national sovereignty) and giving Europol the power to enter alerts in the Schengen Information System (SIS) - do not appear to have found significant favour with the member states.

In the table below, member states' comments are divided by state and by the "thematic blocks" to which they refer. Those "thematic blocks" were set out in a previous Council document published by Statewatch. They reflect the main aspects of the proposals and consist of the following:

  • Block 1: enabling Europol to cooperate effectively with private parties
  • Block 2: enabling Europol to process large and complex datasets
  • Block 3: strengthening Europol’s role on research and innovation
  • Block 4: enabling Europol to enter data into the Schengen Information System
  • Block 5: strengthening Europol’s cooperation with third countries
  • Block 6: strengthening Europol’s cooperation with the EPPO
  • Block 7: clarifying that Europol may request the initiation of an investigation of a crime affecting a common interest covered by a Union policy
  • Block 8: strengthening the data protection framework applicable to Europol
  • Block 9: other provisions

Discussions in the Council are taking place in the Law Enforcement Working Party (LEWP) and the Working Party on Justice and Home Affairs Information Exchange (IXIM).

You can find out more about the plans to increase Europol's powers by browsing our previous coverage.

 

General comments

Comments received after meeting on 25 January 2021 (Blocks 1 and 3)

Comments received after the meeting on 8 February 2021 (Blocks 1, 3, 5 and 7)

Comments received after the meeting on 22 February 2021 (Block 4)

Austria

Document

Document

Document

 

Belgium

Document

Document

Document

Document

Bulgaria

 

Document

Document

Document

Croatia

Document

   

Document

Cyprus

 

Document

Document

 

Czech Republic

Document

Document

Document

Document

Estonia

 

Document

 

Document

Finland

 

Document

Document

 

France

Document

Document

Document

Document

Germany

Document

Document

Document

 

Greece

 

 

 

Document

Hungary

Document

 

Document

 

Ireland

 

 

 

Document

Italy

Document

Document

Document

Document

Latvia

 

 

Document

Document

Lithuania

Document

Document

Document

Document

Malta

 

 

Document

 

Netherlands

 

 

 

Document

Poland

 

Document

Document

Document

Romania

 

Document

Document

 

Slovenia

 

 

 

Document

Spain

Document

Document

Document

Document

Our work is only possible with your support.
Become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

 

Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.

Report error