See: NOTE from: Presidency to: Delegations: Draft Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters (e-evidence) – Report on the State of Play (Council doc. 10316/21, LIMITE, 30 June 2021, pdf):
“Despite the very opposing starting points of the co-legislators, a compromise text was reached on the definition of service providers and categories of data, including on the data necessary for the identification of the subject, on the grounds for non-execution of an Order for reasons of a formal nature, on the acceptance of additional languages for the transmission of Orders and certificates, as well as on the possibility that Orders may be requested by the suspect or accused person or by a lawyer representing him or her.
Even though the desired progress regarding notification has not been made, the Presidency believes that important discussions have been held to clarify and better understand the positions of the co-legislators.
During the process, the Presidency tried to ensure that the coherence of the system as a whole was never out of sight. It also advocated that, while considering the specific nature of electronic evidence, the regulation has to add value in relation to the instruments and forms of cooperation already in place, and that it should rely upon the principle of mutual trust between Member States.”
Further reading
- 19 May 2021: EU: E-Evidence: Media and journalists, civil society groups, professional organisations and technology companies demand fundamental rights protections
- 17 February 2021: EU: Criminal justice: Parliament’s “e-evidence” position under fire from judicial practitioners
- 02 February 2021: EU: Secret negotiations on e-evidence: Council and Parliament positions side-by-side