05 July 2017
Frontex in the Balkans: Serbian government rejects EU's criminal immunity proposals
- Plans to subject European border guards operating in Serbia to officials' home Member State law hit problems
- Fundamental rights provisions no longer include explicit protection from discrimination on grounds of "gender identity"
Follow us: | | Tweet
See: Status agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Serbia on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency on the territory of the Republic of Serbia(9318/17, RESTREINT/RESTRICTED, 19 May 2017, pdf)
The EU's proposal for Article 6, 'Privileges and Immunities of the members of the team', would exempt members of Frontex teams operating in Serbia from the jurisdiction of Serbian administrative, civil and criminal law.
The provisional text agreed following two rounds of negotiations shows that the Serbian side wishes to replace the EU's proposal with the following text:
"1. During the action, members of the team shall be treated in the same way as police officers of the Republic of Serbia in respect of all criminal offences that might be committed against or by them.
2. The Republic of Serbia may, upon examining all circumstances of a specific case, decide to transfer criminal proceedings to the competent authorities of the home Member State.
3. The Agency shall be held liable for any possible damage caused by members of the team while acting in the Republic of Serbia."
For the EU's part, it has proposed deleting the first paragraph of Article 6, removing the provision: "Members of the team shall not be subject to any form of arrest or detention in the Republic of Serbia." However, this appears to be the only compromise offered so far.
It is not clear which of these two positions would be preferable from the standpoint of those who would be the subject of Frontex teams' actions. A 2016 report (pdf) on the accountability of the Serbian police published by the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy found that:
"the rules relating to the procedure of filing complaints against police officers are unclear and unavailable, and as such deter citizens from filing complaints. As a result, 90% of the filed complaints are resolved by a conclusion that there had been no violation of the citizens rights."
Discrimination on gender identity grounds
The text, circulated to the secretive Council of the EU working group the JHA Counsellors on 19 May, also shows that the two sides have agreed to delete the words "gender identity" from a list of grounds on which Frontex and Member State officials must not discriminate against individuals. Specifically, the text says:
"While performing their tasks and exercising their powers, they [members of the Frontex team] shall not arbitrarily discriminate against persons on any grounds including sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age, sexual orientation or
While the resulting text is in keeping with Article 7 of the Schengen Borders Code ("border guards shall not discriminate against persons on grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation") it removes specific protections for people arguably facing a particular risk of discrimination.
Keeping the 'Balkan Route' closed
The proposed deal with Serbia will allow Frontex teams (made up of Frontex staff or border guards and other relevant staff from participating Member States) to carry out activities on Serbian territory, specifically:
The first two could perhaps be considered as the externalisation of the EU border within Europe, to Serbia - a clear attempt to ensure that the 'Balkans Route', used by so many people to travel to safety until spring 2016, remains "closed".
The third point, on return operations, is pertinent given that the recent report on the "operationalisation of the European Border and Coast Guard" showed that the majority of Frontex-coordinated return operations between January and June had Western Balkans countries as their destination (101 of 144 flights).
The EU is also attempting to reach a similar agreement with Macedonia. The deals are based on the new Frontex Regulation, adopted in September 2016. As summarised by ECRE (emphasis added):
"Under Article 54 of the EBCG Regulation, [pdf] which was adopted in September 2016 Frontex may carry out actions at the external borders involving one or more Member States and a third country neighbouring at least one of those Member States, including on the territory of that third country. This is a highly controversial extension of Frontex powers to engage with third countries in border management. Although legally ambiguous, working arrangements concluded by the Agency with third countries under its previous mandate only allowed for technical cooperation and support, excluding any operational activity on the territory of the third country concerned."
It is currently unknown when negotiations with Serbia will be concluded. A Commission spokesperson told Statewatch in mid-June that:
"The first round of negotiations took place on 7 April in Brussels and was followed by a second round in Belgrade on 11-12 May. There has been a considerable progress made in reaching preliminary agreement on the text, however some issues still remain open. The next round of negotiations is not scheduled yet."
See also: Deploying armed Frontex teams on the 'Balkan Route': agreements with Serbia and Macedonia on the way (Statewatch News Online, 1 May 2017)
Did you find this article useful?
Support our work by making a one-off or regular donation to help us continue to monitor the state and civil liberties in Europe.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: c/o MDR, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH, UK. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.