“The exact drafting on the possible use of spyware in relation to journalistic sources is still under discussion,” says the document (pdf), dated 4 May, with negotiations ongoing in the Council’s Audio Visual Media Working Party.
“Although all Member States agree on a common strong protection of journalistic sources,” the document continues, “the provisions giving possibilities for exceptional instances still need further discussion and fine-tuning.”
The EMFA “aims to improve the functioning of the internal media market,” according to the European Commission, and also includes “a targeted safeguard against the deployment of spyware in devices used by media service providers or journalists.”
“Since the initial Pegasus Project revelations, we’ve learned that governments and private actors in over 46 countries worldwide, including EU member states, have used invasive spyware to target and silence journalists, human rights defenders, political opponents, and dissidents. “
European Digital Rights recently argued that the Commission’s proposal:
“…risks legalising routine deployment of spyware and other repressive measures involving or not surveillance technologies against journalists. This is due to the large broad and undefined scope of safeguarding “national security”, an area of exclusive competence of the Member States. Yet, it has been demonstrated how Member States have abused this notion of national security to impose mass surveillance or other exceptional repressive measures, not just in pursuit of fighting terrorism, but also for social and political control. It is therefore not acceptable that EU law endorses the “ground of national security” to justify the use of spyware against journalists. This exception counteracts the desired effect to protect journalists.”
It is unclear what precisely the Council’s “fine-tuning” involves – but given the institution’s record, it is unlikely to involve increasing the level of protection set out by the proposal.
Documentation
- Regulation on the European Media Freedom Act – Progress report (Council doc. 8679/1/23 REV 1, 4 May 2023, pdf)
