EU: E-evidence: latest Council "state of play" document

A note from the Slovenian Presidency outlines some of the issues that have emerged in negotiations with the European Parliament on new rules designed to ease cross-border access to digital data for use in criminal investigations and judicial proceedings.


NOTE from: Presidency to: Delegations: Draft Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters (e-evidence) - State of play and way forward (Council doc. 12155/21, LIMITE, 30 September 2021, pdf):

"The Presidency has continued its efforts to identify possible compromises with the European Parliament for the notification block of rules in the draft Regulation. Both legislators approach the matter in a very good atmosphere of cooperation, but there are clear differences in substance. Indeed, it is the impression of the Presidency that the European Parliament has a clear willingness to make concessions on issues it a priori considers important, such as on the scope of the notification obligations, the suspensive effect of orders and the character of the grounds for refusal. As regards the so-called residence criterion, however, the Parliament continues to strongly defend its view that the residence of a person should in principle not have any effect on the notification obligation, although there seems to be some room to discuss the modalities.

A few possible approaches in the sense of a compromise were analysed and discussed at the
meeting of COPEN on 22 September. The Presidency has attempted to summarize these discussions
in a new consolidated draft approach, which will be shared with delegations in view of the meeting
of COPEN on 6 October. The Annex to the current note sets out to develop a couple of issues, with
a view to include them in the consolidated draft approach, which could be the basis of a
compromise package to agree with the Parliament. Delegations are invited to analyse these issues in
detail and to reflect on the questions at the end of the Annex."

 

Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.

Report error