ECHR rules on right to silence

Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

In what promises to be an important ruling for campaigners against the Criminal Justice Bill's attacks on the presumption of innocence and the right to silence, the European Commission on Human Rights ruled that the use at Ernest Saunders' trial, of incriminating evidence obtained oppressively substantially impaired his ability to defend himself against the criminal charges facing him. The Commission ruled that Saunders was deprived of a fair hearing within the meaning of Article 6:1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case now goes to the European Court whose ruling is not expected until 1996.

Our work is only possible with your support.
Become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

 Previous article

Overseas students to be vetted

Next article 

Judges (1)

 

Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.

Report error