Thematic and regional updates

12 May 2025

Brief updates on border management, budgets and funding, deportation and readmission and migration partnerships - including many summaries of internal EU documents made public by Statewatch.

Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

All the documents summarised here, and those published with previous editions of the bulletin, are contained in our document archive.

Contents

Border management
Budgets and funding
Deportation and readmission
Migration partnerships
Other
Other updates to the document archive

Border management

From 25-27 March, Madrid played host to the World Border Security Congress. Topics on the agenda included “OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) at the Border” and “Emerging Trends in Technology at the Border.” Multiple speakers were present from European governments, as well as from other states around the world and international organisations.

On 8-9 April, representatives of 16 states in the Prague Process participated in a workshop on border surveillance. A number of EU and other international institutions were also present. A summary of the meeting notes that, amongst the “highlights” was the view that combining “real-time intelligence, risk analysis, modern surveillance tools, and physical infrastructure” are “effective responses to evolving migration challenges.”

On 19 March, the Working Party on Frontiers discussed (pdf) “national policies and innovations in the area of combating new threats at the borders,” in relation to “external sea border protection.”

Budgets and funding

In February, a European Commission communication on the EU’s next “multiannual financial framework” (budget) referred to funding for border externalisation policies: “The next long-term budget should therefore help address challenges related to migration, including effective protection of the EU external borders and comprehensive partnerships with countries of origin and transit.”

Deportation and readmission

On 16 April the European Commission published a proposal to “frontload elements of the Pact on Migration and Asylum as well as a first EU list of safe countries of origin.” The proposal is designed to make it easier for member states to place asylum-seekers from certain countries into accelerated procedures, limiting their rights and the safeguards that apply to their asylum application.

EU law expert Steve Peers sums the proposal up as “both murky and unprincipled: an unimpressive start to the next phase of EU asylum law.” A document (pdf) drafted to inform the SCIFA meeting on 13 February notes that the “practical implementation” of the safe third country concept has so far been limited, and “pilot projects” might be useful “to gain further experience in this area.”

On 1 and 23 April, the Working Party on Integration, Migration and Expulsion (IMEX) discussed the European Commission’s proposed deportation Regulation, known formally as the proposal for a “common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union.”

At its 1 April meeting, IMEX also discussed implementation of the “return border procedure.” A document (pdf) provides some background to the discussion.

SCIFA held a “strategic discussion ahead of the expected new return framework” (pdf) at its meeting on 13 February.

Officials in IMEX continue to discuss ways to increase the number of deportations under the current legal framework. On the agenda of the January meeting were the results of the 2024 “thematic Schengen evaluation” of the EU’s deportation systems, and how to increase “the effectiveness of returns in view of the future legal framework.” A number of documents related to those discussions are published with this bulletin.

At the IMEX meeting on 18 February, “digitalisation of the third country nationals’ identification process” (pdf) was on the agenda. The Commission due to publish a proposal on “digitalisation of the return process” later this year.

Migration partnerships

On 7 May, the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR, one of the right-wing groups in the European Parliament) hosted an event ‘Libya and Mediterranean Migratory Routes’. The publicity for the event described Libya as “a key country for controlling migratory routes and the security of Europe.” It featured speakers from the ECR group, as well as Libyan officials.

Authorities in Libya recently expelled a number of aid groups it accused of “plotting to change the country's ethnic make-up by encouraging African migrants to stay there,” the same line as adopted by the Tunisian authorities prior to launching a wave of violence and repression and migrants and those who support them.

Four different types of “migration agreements” agreed between the EU and other states are examined in a new note from the Meijers Committee (pdf), published on 6 May:

agreements based on the “safe third country” concept;
financial support agreements;
externalised asylum procedures; and
“return hubs.”

The note highlights “common issues including blurred accountability, limited access to justice, and potential breaches of non-refoulement obligations.”

On 10 April, the Strategic Committee on Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum discussed the role of the EU’s “comprehensive partnerships” on migration with third countries. The details of the discussion remain unknown.

The Khartoum Process is “a platform for political cooperation amongst the countries along the migration route between the Horn of Africa and Europe.” Its 10^th anniversary was marked by a ministerial meeting Egypt on 9 April.

Ministers adopted a Declaration (pdf) and a new Action Plan (pdf). The Declaration describes the Plan as “the strategic framework guiding the Khartoum Process.” It covers five areas:

strengthen the nexus between regular migration and development as well as address the root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement;
promote regular migration and mobility, in particular of young people and women;
ensure international protection for refugees and forcibly displaced persons and the respect of the dignity and the human rights of all migrants;
reduce and prevent irregular migration and fight against smuggling of migrants and trafficking in human beings;
strengthen international, regional and bilateral cooperation for safe, timely, dignified and effective return, readmission and for sustainable reintegration.

The Ministerial Conference followed the 13^th Senior Officials’ Meeting, held on 8 April. At that meeting, the French government announced some of its priorities for its forthcoming presidency of the Khartoum Process: “cross-cutting issues such as legal identity, anti-trafficking efforts, climate-related migration, and addressing missing migrants.”

Officials in the External Aspects of Asylum and Migration Working Party (EMWP) discussed the “operationalisation of the New Pact on Asylum and Migration” through cooperation with non-EU states on 26 March.

The note (pdf) was drafted for the Polish Presidency of the Council by the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD). It recommends that the EU use the various “processes” run by the ICMPD to aid the border externalisation agenda.

Cooperation between the EU and Senegal was also discussed at the EMWP’s meeting on 26 March, as part of a wider discussion on the “Western Mediterranean Route.”

A document (pdf) produced for the meeting says that “developing an effective system of border management, including maritime, land borders and international airports” is “a key political objective” of the Senegalese government elected in 2024. “The EU is urging cooperation in areas such as border management, smuggling of migrants and combating trafficking in human beings, return and readmission of irregular migrant,” the document says.

Two documents on the EU Border Assistance Mission in Libya were published alongside our analysis on EU-Libya cooperation:

Interim Strategic Assessment (ISA) EUBAM Libya 2024 (5 July 2024)
Presentation on EUBAM Libya (21 October 2024) from a meeting on the same date

Other

At the end of March, 27 partner countries of the Rabat Process met with civil society and international organisations “to improve cooperation on missing migrant cases.”

In March, the Visa Working Party discussed (pdf) possible changes to the EU’s visa suspension mechanism. These would allow the targeting of people holding “special categories” of passport, in response to political or legal concerns.

That discussion followed one held in in February, when the Visa Working Party discussed (pdf) the implementation of measures to partially suspend the EU-Georgia visa agreement, with regard to holders of Georgian diplomatic passports.

At the same meeting, a discussion was held on “visa policy alignment” between the EU and non-EU states covered by the visa suspension mechanism.

Our work is only possible with your support.
Become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

News and analysis

Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.