25 February 2021
A new report from the European Centre for Not-for-Profit Law looking at how security-related legislation introduced or used by states during the pandemic has restricted civic freedoms and human rights.
See: Civic space in the era of securitised COVID-19 responses (ECNL, link)
The report examines how states have prioritised security measures in their responses to the virus, with France taken as a particular example.
There, Macron's government has also taken advantage of the lack of public scrutiny and parliamentary oversight and input to pass other restrictive measures, such as the Law on Global Security, says the report.
Other examples from around the world are also provided as part of a "worldwide snapshot", before the report looks at particular types of security measures:
The report concludes with a number of recommendations for civil society organisations on ways to challenge new security measures, in order to prevent them becoming permanent.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: c/o MDR, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH, UK. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.