09 September 2020
The UK government has announced "plans to enable the use of digital identity across the UK," stating its intention to "update existing laws and a new set of guiding principles for policy development."
The announcement was condemned by civil liberties campaigners and digital identity advocates alike.
The former have highlighted the previous opposition of many politicians currently in government to the scrapped national identity card scheme, a string of scandals and failures involving personal data in government departments and state agencies, and the possibilities for pervasive, intrusive surveillance offered by digital identity schemes in combination with other new technologies. See: The UK's online ID plans: expensive, intrusive, unnecessary (The Guardian)
The latter, meanwhile, have denounced the government for not having a clear plan at all. A Computer Weekly report cites members of an expert panel at the TechUK event, who "found it lacked clear actions and outcomes on how to move forward with digital identity." See: Experts slam government digital ID response (Computer Weekly)
A government press release states that:
"...the government plans to update existing laws on identity checking to enable digital identity to be used as widely as possible.
It will consult on developing legislation for consumer protection relating to digital identity, specific rights for individuals, an ability to seek redress if something goes wrong, and set out where the responsibility for oversight should lie. It will also consult on the appropriate privacy and technical standards for administering and processing secure digital identities."
"Being able to prove identity digitally has become essential to facilitate everyday tasks such as buying food and organising our finances." (emphasis added)
The responses to that call for evidence appear to have come overwhelmingly from the private sector, in particular from many companies with a vested interest in the development of a more comprehensive digital identity scheme in the UK. Is that really necessary? As Gracie Mae Bradley argues in the piece in The Guardian cited above:
"We shouldn’t blithely accept a digital ID system as a necessary evil in the modern world. There’s a lot more at stake here than being able to buy a pint more conveniently. Why not press for the one option that is all too often overlooked: rather than massively increasing state and corporate surveillance capacity in a bid to make ID checks easier, what if we simply got rid of some of them altogether? For starters, hostile environment checks – such as making landlords and banks check people’s immigration status – could and should go."
The government response: Digital Identity: Call for Evidence Response (pdf, as updated on 8 September)
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: 10 Queen Street Place, London EC4R 1BE. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.