07 June 2019
Returns, migration challenges, data retention, e-evidence deal with USA and 5G
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
See: Press release for 6-7 June: final (pdf)
E-evidence agreement with the USA
ADDENDUM to the recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations with a view to concluding an agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on cross-border access to electronic evidence for judicial cooperation in criminal matters - adoption 9666/19 (pdf)
And 9114-19 (pdf): COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations with a view to concluding an agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on cross-border access to electronic evidence for judicial cooperation in criminal matters
See also: European Data Protection Supervisor: Opinion (pdf) The EDPS observes that the agreement relies on the "Umbrella Agreement" which did not include many of the points he raised.
It should also be noted that the EU has yet to adopt its own measures on e-evidence. The Council has adopted its "General approach" (negotiating position) but the European Parliament has not adopted its position.
Further reading: CCBE position on the Commission proposal for a Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters - CJEU ruling casts doubts on the legality of the proposed e-evidence regulation
Visas and readmission
The Council agreed amendments to the: Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code) (pdf)
This includes a new Article 25a "Cooperation on readmission" which will monitor country by country cooperation by third countries in accepting returns from the EU> Non-cooperation could be subject to "levers" on third countries who do not cooperate sufficiently to take back their own nationals, for example by delaying visa processing.
See: Statewatch Analysis: The EU goes to war with African “elite” (pdf)
"The aim of the proposed new rules is to speed up return procedures, prevent absconding and secondary movements, and increase the rate of returns. To achieve this, the partial negotiating position includes:
- clearer and faster procedures for issuing return decisions and for lodging appeals, including an obligation to issue a return decision at the same time or shortly after a decision ending a legal stay
- an obligation for persons subject to a return procedure to cooperate and the possibility of taking action in case of non-cooperation
- more efficient rules on voluntary returns, including an obligation to set up dedicated programmes in member states
- a common, non-exhaustive, list of objective criteria to determine the risk of absconding
- the possibility of detaining a third country national if they pose a risk to public order, public security or national security
- as a last resort, and when a series of guarantees are provided, the possibility of returning a third country national to any safe third country."
The Council adopted the: Regulatiom on strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement (pdf) and Press release: Better security for ID documents: Council adopts new rules (link)
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.