28 February 2018
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
European Investment Bank proposes giving 2bn per year to "dual-use technology, cybersecurity and civilian security"
Follow us: | | Tweet
According to the EIB Group "Operating Framework and Operational Plan 2018":
"Concerning defence and security, Europe now faces starker threats to its internal and external security than at any time since 1945. Faced with unprecedented terror and online attacks, the EU leadership has acted to reassure citizens that it is capable of protecting and defending them, and the European Council has asked EIB Group to step up its activities in support of the EU Security and Defence Agenda. The Group has responded by developing a proposal Protect, Secure, Defend: European Security Initiative to provide a framework for increased contributions in this area. The proposal foresees that the Group would significantly scale up its financing to EUR 6bn over 3 years in the areas of dual-use technology, cybersecurity and civilian security whilst leveraging its expertise to provide assistance to the establishment of the Cooperative Financial Mechanism (CFM) under the responsibility of the European Defence Agency (EDA) as well as to the nascent European Defence Fund." [emphasis added]
See: Our Purpose, Our Future, Our Plan: The EIB Group Operating Framework and Operational Plan 2018 (pdf)
The proposal demonstrates the increasing weight being given to EU security and defence policies, although there is little further detail in the document about how the EIB "framework" might function.
The December 2016 European Council conclusions (pdf) invited the EIB "to examine steps with a view to supporting investments in defence research and development activities." The proposed inclusion of cybersecurity and civilian security suggests that the EIB plan would go beyond this into the realm of internal security.
At the EIB's annual press conference in January (pdf), Werner Hoyer, the bank's president, made this possibility clear: "We will be more active in dual-use technologies for both defense and civilian applications."
He subsequently said in response (YouTube, link) to a question from Jane's Defence Weekly that:
"Although we do not intend to invest into weapons production, that's not our business, helping the MS to make Europe a safer and more secure place is of course an obligation for the bank to fulfil. And in the crisis of migration it has become very obvious that the expectations of the MS and the European institutions vis-a-vis the bank are enormous, we try to meet that.
We will be very careful not to have a negative impact on our funding activities because we need the money from the capital markets and we will be very cautious not to be considered as a weapons producer or as somebody who supports the production of lethal weapons, that is not our job, but security and defence are a much wider concept where a bank like ours can have a significant impact, and I have promised the European Council that we are intending to go that way."
With regard to the forthcoming European Defence Fund - worth almost 600 million between 2017 and 2020, and a proposed minimum of 1.5 billion annually between 2021 and 2027 - the Commission highlighted the potential role of the EIB in June last year, when the Fund was launched:
"What are the links between the European Defence Fund and the European Investment Bank?
The capability window includes the possibility of using financial instruments to support SMEs and mid-caps in closing the gap between research and development. The Financial Toolbox also provides for the use of guarantees on project-related funding of suppliers. These financial instruments could be implemented with the European Investment Bank (EIB) group or other relevant partners.
Currently, although the European Investment Bank (EIB) group can support some relevant investments, such as i) Research development innovation for dual-use technologies, as far as these investments can be motivated by their commercialisation in civilian applications; ii) protection of physical infrastructures; and iii) telecommunications and information infrastructure.
The EIB has already announced its willingness to scale up these investments and engage with the Commission and Member States to assess if there are gaps in its policies."
See: The European Defence Fund: Questions and Answers (European Commission, link)
The EIB proposals are just one of many efforts to raise more money for military and security policies, as highlighted by the European Network Against the Arms Trade:
"In its European Defence Action Plan presented on 30 November 2016, the EC proposed an increased use of the EU Structural Funds (ESIF) and of the Regional funds (ERDF), encouraging the creation of regional clusters of excellence in the field of defence, as well as access to COSME funds (Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs). The arms sector also became a priority under the new Skills Agenda for Europe, by supporting an industry-led European Defence Skills Alliance and making use of EU funds such as COSME and Erasmus+, the EU programme for education, training, youth and sport!"
The Network highlights that:
"There is a clear trend towards considering the arms industry as a normal business and defence as a top priority: this paradigm shift was obvious in the 2016 Statement to the Union of the President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker (Q25), and all Commissioners have been asked to look for ways to contribute to the strengthening of the armament industry in their own field of action."
See: 3. Where will the EU money come from? Will Member States be obliged to contribute to the Defence Fund? in: All you want to know about the EU Defence Fund, and why this is not good for peace nor for jobs and growth(ENAAT, link)
Search our database for more articles and information or subscribe to our mailing list for regular updates from Statewatch News Online.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.