10 October 2017
Left in limbo: UNHCR study on the implementation of the Dublin Regulation
Follow us: | | Tweet
With the prospect of further reform of the Dublin system being proposed, the research seeks to assess the extent to which the Dublin Regulation is implemented as well as the challenges that Member States face in effectively implementing it. The research aims, on the one hand, to formulate recommendations to maximise in the interim the potential of the Dublin III Regulation as it currently stands and provide, on the other hand, recommendations for the longer term to feed into ongoing discussions on the proposed reform.
For practical and other purposes, UNHCR limited the research to 9 of the 32 Member States that take part in the Dublin system: Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Norway, Poland, and the United Kingdom. While the study is confined to a limited number of Member States, its findings are indicative of wider challenges and discrepancies among all Member States applying the Dublin Regulation.
Furthermore, the study does not review the Dublin Regulation in its entirety. Instead, it looks at State practice in the application of the criteria for determining the Member State responsible that relate to children (Article 8) and family members (Articles 9 and 10), the dependency criteria (Article 16) and the discretionary clauses (Article 17) and in this way complements the evaluation of the implementation of the Dublin III Regulation carried out by the European Commission which was issued in March 2016.
The study focuses on assessing how the procedural safeguards and guarantees for applicants are applied in practice in the Dublin procedure, in particular as regards: the provision of information to applicants about their rights and obligations (Article 4), the opportunity for applicants to provide information to help determine the Member State responsible (Article 5), guarantees for children (Article 6), the notification of transfer decisions to applicants (Article 26(1)) and the modalities of transfers. In the context of transfers, the study looks also at whether applicants who are subject to transfer continue to benefit from the provision of reception conditions up until the point of their departure to the Member State responsible. It also looks at whether and how often detention (or an alternative to detention) is used for purposes of securing a transfer carried out in accordance with the Dublin Regulation (Article 28), including what criteria for defining a risk of absconding have been established in national law (Article 2(n)) and how those criteria are applied in practice. Finally, the study looks at the reasons for the low rate of successful transfers of applicants."
See the full report: Left in limbo: UNHCR study on the implementation of the Dublin Regulation (pdf) and: Executive summary (pdf)
See also the extensive: Recommendations (pdf) which cover:
1. Provision of information
2. Personal interview
3. Guarantees for children
4. Determining Member State responsibility for examining an application for international protection
5. Discretionary clauses
7. Use of detention
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: 10 Queen Street Place, London EC4R 1BE. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.