30 October 2017
ECHR: Two findings of torture against Italy: Genoa G8 protest detainees and prisoners in Asti Correctional Facility
Follow us: | | Tweet
Genoa G8 detainees
"In todays Chamber judgments1 in the cases of Blair and Others v. Italy (applications nos. 1442/14, 21319/14 and 21911/14) and Azzolina and Others v. Italy (applications nos. 28923/09 and 67599/10) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been:
a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The cases concerned incidents following the G8 Summit in Genoa in 2001, when demonstrators were subjected to violence by law-enforcement officers while in detention. The applicants alleged that they had been subjected to torture and complained that the investigation by the domestic courts had been ineffective, in particular because the statute of limitations had been applied to virtually all the acts committed and because a number of those convicted had been granted a remission of their sentence.
The Court held, in particular, that the ill-treatment suffered by the applicants was beyond doubt, having been established in a detailed and thorough manner by the domestic courts. The applicants, who had been in a particularly vulnerable situation owing to their detention, had been subjected to physical, verbal and psychological abuse which in the Courts view amounted to torture. Owing to the lack of an offence of torture in Italian law at the time of the events, virtually all the acts of violence had been statute-barred when the cases came to trial. Because of the application of the statute of limitations and the remissions of sentence granted to several of those convicted, none of the persons found to be responsible had received appropriate punishment. The Court therefore held that the applicants had not had the benefit of an effective official investigation."
See also: GENOA 2001: ECHR Press release: Police violence: Italian criminal law inadequate and not an effective deterrent (Statewatch News Online, April 2015)
Prisoners in Asti Correctional Facility
See: Prison officers responsible for torture of detainees unpunished due to lack of adequate legislation (press release, pdf)
"Prison officers responsible for torture of detainees unpunished due to lack of adequate legislation
The case of Cirino and Renne v. Italy (application nos. 2539/13 and 4705/13) concerned the complaint by two detainees that in December 2004 they were ill-treated by prison officers of the Asti Correctional Facility, and that those responsible were not appropriately punished.
In todays Chamber judgment in the case the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been:
violations of Article 3 (prohibition of torture and of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights, both as regards the treatment sustained by the applicants (substantive aspect) and as regards the response by the domestic authorities (procedural aspect).
The Court held that the ill-treatment inflicted on the applicants which had been deliberate and carried out in a premeditated and organised manner while they were in the custody of prison officers had amounted to torture.
In the Courts view, the domestic courts had made a genuine effort to establish the facts and to identify the individuals responsible for the treatment inflicted on the applicants. However, those courts had concluded that, under Italian law in force at the time, there was no legal provision allowing them to classify the treatment in question as torture. They had had to turn to other provisions of the Criminal Code, which were subject to statutory limitation periods. As a result of this lacuna in the legal system, the domestic courts had been ill-equipped to ensure that treatment contrary to Article 3 perpetrated by State officials did not go unpunished."
Judgment: Case of Cirino and Renne v Italy (pdf)
And see: ECtHR finds Italy guilty of degrading treatment without adequate judicial remedy in mass prison beatings case(pdf) by Yasha Maccanico, August 2014
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: c/o MDR, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH, UK. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.