28 March 2012
For anyone who followed the case of Oury Jalloh, who burnt to death in police custody in 2005 whilst being handcuffed to a fire-proof mattress, the judgment of 8 December by the Dessau-Roßlau court, which clears two police officers of, respectively, bodily harm resulting in death and negligence resulting in death, comes as no surprise (see Statewatch vol 18 no 3 on institutional racism that defined Jalloh's case from his arrest and death to the judgment). The judgment led to public unrest in the audience, in particular the black community, following the trial.
The Oury Jalloh Initiative had already withdrawn from the trial proceedings saying they were "farcical", as the court had presumed suicide before all the evidence had been presented. In fact, despite dozens of interrogated police officers, no consistent sequence of events could be determined by the court.
The asylum rights organisationPro Asyl called for an international and independent experts commission to retry the case and criticised that the Oury Jalloh judgment, as well as another recent judgment from Bremen court that cleared the police of all charges of another black death in custody as a result of force-feeding emetics to Laya Alama Condé, suspected of having swlaaowed drugs. Pro Asyl states that these judgements prove that in Germany, "ignorance and professional incompetence indeed protect perpetration from punishment, if the victim is black."
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: c/o MDR, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH, UK. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.