28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
UK/Spain:
Spanish lawyer questioned using antiterrorist powers in King's
Cross
Gustavo Garcia, a lawyer from Vigo (Galicia) and member of the
civil liberties and human rights observatory Esculca, and Mahmut
Colak, a Kurd who has Spanish nationality and resides in London,
were held and questioned separately for over three hours on arrival
at 8 a.m. at London's Saint Pancras train station from Brussels
on 6 December 2007.
Colak was also questioned by British immigration officers in
Brussels, causing them both to miss the train on which they had
originally planned to travel to London. They had participated
in the "Fourth International Conference about the EU,
Turkey and the Kurds" on 3 and 4 December, endorsed
by the European Parliament and whose patrons included bishop
Desmond Tutu and Norman Mailer. They were informed that they
were being held for "Examination" under the "Terrorism
Act 2000", applicable to people who are, or have been, "concerned
in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism",
to ascertain "whether you appear to be such a person"
prior to detention.
Garcia's account describes the questioning as "exhaustive" and concerning all aspects of his professional and personal life (including his religion and relationship with the Kurds), and as focussing largely on the matters discussed in the Brussels conference. Their luggage was searched, and all the documents in his suitcase were perused "sheet by sheet", including confidential documents pertaining to his work as a lawyer.
When some documents were photocopied, after Garcia objected to this, he was told that under the Terrorism Act, "if you deliberately fail to comply with any of these duties, you could be prosecuted under paragraph 18 (1) of Schedule 7". Such duties included making any documentation requested by the official available, resulting in the copying of all the contact details in his mobile phone by copying the SIM card, and his having to provide his e-mail account's username and password to allow them to access it. From the documentation he had, provided at the conference and relating to the Kurdish issue, the conference programme, list of participants, final resolutions and list of participants, as well as Abdullah Ocalan's "Proposal for a solution of the Kurdish Question in Turkey" were selected for photocopying.
Garcia expresses his concern that although their participation in the conference was "entirely irreproachable", the police officers deemed it sufficient to "question us in application of the Terrorism Act and deprive us of the basic rights of privacy of data and communications and of our very freedom, during over three hours' questioning, in spite of having asserted what kind of conference it was from the very first moment…".
He argues that the fact
that there was no other possible reason for his being viewed
as a threat to British security than his travelling with a Kurd,
proves how the application of this exceptional legislation is
"indiscriminate and constitutes a general practice"
rather than an exception, and wonders how other people are treated,
if this treatment is reserved to a lawyer working on human rights
issues who is well aware of his rights.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.