28 March 2012
Public order: Conflict management..
"Public order: Conflict management: Experts meeting in Brussels on 15 April 1998"
Following on the Joint Action of 26 May 1997, "Joint Action with regard to cooperation on law and order and security", this document records the views of EU "experts" on public order. It illustrates the construction of "threats" and includes gems like: "Conflict has the potential adversely to affect the status quo". See Statewatch European Monitor, vol 1 no 1, 1998.
3 April 1998
to: Cooperation Group (experts on public order)
no. prev. doe.: 8012/97 ENFOPOL 111
Subject: Public order: Conflict management
- Experts meeting in Brussels on 15 April 1998
As previously advised by the Presidency, the 15th April 1998
will be set aside as a Public Order Experts Meeting. The meeting
will commence at 10.30am. It would be helpful if Member States
would include in their delegations appropriate experts to allow
a full discussion of the subjects listed below. These cover a
experience from mediation to strategy development and training and implementation of Public Order tactics.
The agenda for the meeting will be as follows;
1. Adoption of Agenda
2. Review of the measures set out in the joint action of 26 May 1997 (8012/97 ENFOPOL 111), taking in discussion of relevant results of 12448/97 ENFOPOL 220 and 13232/97 ENFOPOL 235
3. Other issues addressed by 12448/97 ENFOPOL 220 and 13232/97 ENFOPOL 235
4. European Information and Intelligence Databases
5. Conflict Management Strategy (including Policing Styles)
The Presidency invites delegations to take note that this Public Order Experts Meeting on 15th April will precede the full meeting of the Police Co-operation Working Group on 16 and 17 April.
The principal business for the experts meeting will be to
review the measures set out in ENFOPOL 111, taking in discussion
of relevant results of the two questionnaires, 12448/97 ENFOPOL
220 and 13232/97 ENFOPOL 235, for which responses were requested
by 20 March 1998. Delegations will wish to ensure that they comply
with this deadline in order that the results can be tabled and discussed at the Public Order Experts Meeting.
The meeting will also discuss proposals for European Information and Intelligence databases, and the proposals made in the paper titled "Conflict Management" (see below).
1. The Current Situation
1.1 The Police Co-operation Working Group seeks to promote and develop the policing of transnational crime and disorder. In order to achieve that, Member States share information on events, places and suspects. Information includes knowledge about techniques and skills required to prevent unlawful behaviour. This exercise is presently event-driven. Members States will be very familiar, for example, with exchanges of intelligence and football spotters ahead of European fixtures.
1.2 Police operations for "Euro 96" and "France
98" football tournaments have demonstrated what can be achieved
through close co-operation. Nevertheless, several countries have
expressed concern and frustration with the current "network"
for exchanging information and intelligence. There is a genuine
desire to improve that "network" and to facilitate
a rapid flow of data on all other types of crime and disorder
1.3 At today's meeting, as well as reviewing the effectiveness of the present network and examining how arrangements can be improved, Member States are invited to exchange experiences in the establishment of national disorder intelligence and information systems, such as the UK system which was recently successfully employed to manage conflict arising from farmers' disputes; and to consider the case for a permanent information system capable of pre-empting conflict and informing police tactics to prevent such activity materialising. It is also necessary to acknowledge that conflict comprises both crime and disorder.
2. Organised Events
2.1 Whilst recognising the importance of planning for major
football tournaments, the United Kingdom has found that football
hooliganism is symptomatic of a much wider problem. Hooligans
often have criminal records that include offences of violence,
damage and dishonesty: moreover they are sometimes associated
with political demonstrations and direct action groups that have
no sporting connections whatsoever. Accordingly, conflict has
impacted on all types of organised events, including music festivals, environmental protests and public holiday
2.2 By their very nature, these events require a degree of organisation by those involved. This gives police the opportunity to identify and manage any potential conflict. It is standard practice for UK forces to direct primary efforts at the prevention and reduction of conflict, through effective management. Secondary efforts are directed at the prompt and effective resolution of conflict, when it occurs. This paper outlines the UK experience and invites EU experts to consider the case for developing a Pan-European approach.
3. What is Conflict Management?
3.1 Conflict may be defined as "any act that is contrary to the general public's perception of normality or which adversely affects their quality of life". It follows that disorder and crime are just different aspects of conflict.
3.2 Conflict has the potential adversely to affect the status quo. Crime is well recognised and understood; it has been the focus of police and community actions for years. But disorder, which ranges from domestic disputes to lethal rioting, has been largely ignored. Conflict is almost always a predictor of future crime and more serious disorder.
3.3 Conflict Management is the process of identifying tensions in society, outside the norm, and having done so, of deploying appropriate resources to stop the problem escalating, with a view to returning a community to its former normality. It is based upon the premise that "increased tension = increased potential for conflict".
3.4 Timely and appropriate interventions, based on early problem identification, will lead to a more efficient police response. An efficient police response is one that requires the minimum number of resources engaged for the minimum length of time. Thus, the maintenance and restoration of order become cost effective and productive. The diagram at Appendix 1 encapsulates the concept and objectives of conflict management.
3.5 There are four key elements to effective Conflict Management:
* Conflict Intelligence
* Conflict Identification
* Conflict Resolution
* Ethical Values
3.6 Conflict Intelligence - Intelligence is vital to conflict management. UK Police Forces are working towards combining operational intelligence and information systems, to form one integrated conflict management database.
3.7 Conflict Identification - The timely identification of
potential conflict is a critical issue. In many cases, disorder
may be the result of gradually rising tensions; these may not be connected to a single incident. Identification of problems can be enhanced through the use of databases, updated locally, to provide an image of the status quo and therefore alert officers to deviations from it.
3.3 Conflict Resolution - This is the immediate action that takes place to deal with conflict that is occurring. The police have a crucial role to perform in this respect as they are empowered to use lawful force. The police should seek to establish, through mediation, what is to be considered as acceptable and unacceptable behaviour throughout a potential conflict event.
Whenever conflict has been resolved and the status quo has been regained, it is necessary to investigate the circumstances which gave rise to the event: this will ensure that the opportunity for a recurrence is prevented or minimised.
3.9 Ethical Values - Communities must be allowed to enjoy the freedoms and rights that are articulated in the European Convention on Human Rights. This requirement need not detract from our ability to manage conflict. Providing each member of the police force adheres to four simple ethics, the public need not be suspicious about police activity. The four ethics have stood the test of time. They are:
To "Secure and Protect" using "Minimum Force", being "Fair and Reasonable" whilst "Searching for the Truth with the Truth".
Further discussion with respect to ethics and the police officer role is included at Appendix 2.
4. Matching the response to the threat
4.1 Increases in social tensions will cause comparable increases in conflict. Police need to adapt their responses to the phases of conflict, which correspond with the build- up of tensions. The graph shown at Appendix 3 illustrates the relationship between tension levels and stages of a riot as experienced in the United Kingdom. Whilst it is understood that these phases exist, what is not clear is the level of consistency, if any, across different countries and cultures. There is a clear need for further development of the conflict management model in identification and definition of stages of disorder. The assistance of public order experts is requested in respect of this further work.
4.2 It follows that depending upon the type and scale of an incident, a police service can pre-plan its response and identify the types of resources that will be required to manage the various levels of conflict. The chart shown at Appendix 4 describes strategies employed to reduce and prevent conflict.
4.3 The key element to pre-planning is identification. Unless a potential conflict can be identified, preventative or reduction activity will not be possible. In such circumstances, the only policing option will be reaction. Pure reaction means that real problems- leading to disorder are not solved, this in turn leads to a cycle of further reaction. This is the law-enforcement style of policing and it has two serious long-term consequences. The first is that over time the police will become de-skilled in terms of prevention and reduction ability. The second is that demands will continue to rise until they reach such a level that existing police resources will not be able to cope.
4.4 Conflict Management as a policing style allows for and
is in fact dependent on reduction and prevention activity. Officers
work with the local communities and other agencies to solve problems.
This integrated approach provides the foundation for early identification
systems. Early intervention is not always possible with law enforcement;
the traditional peace officer approach appears to be more successful
in this regard. As can be
seen the police service needs to take decisions about the policing style that best fits the roles and functions undertaken at all times. Further information on policing styles is available at Appendix 5.
5. The Future
5.1 If policing is not effective, society leaves itself open to anarchy as values and norms eroded. If conflict is managed, communities can thrive and flourish, in accordance with the tenets of the European Convention on Human Rights.
5.2 In order to achieve their objectives, as described at 1.1 above, the Police Co-operation Working Group are invited to consider:
A. How effective conflict management might be deployed to
prevent and reduce crime and disorder across Europe.
B. The case for establishing at EU level a single, permanent system, for collating and disseminating information that will inform future strategies and tactics.
C. How a more strategic approach could be deployed in preventing conflict and disorder given the different policing styles and techniques used in different member states.
D. What research might be useful in developing a common approach to transnational disorder.
Conflict Management Model
INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS FAST AND SLOW TIME
EARLY PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
EARLIEST EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION
CORRECT LEVEL OF FORCE
LOWER CONFLICT LEVEL
In addition to the freedoms that should be enjoyed by society, the peace officer style of policing provides a certain degree of freedom for police officers. This freedom or discretion is not available for law enforcement officers as a law has been broken or has not been broken and officers act accordingly.
A Peace Officer will be using his or her skill to manage conflict,
as already discussed, through early intervention,
reduction and prevention activities. There are very few, if any, directions or guidelines to police officers performing the peace officer role as to how to use discretion and tolerance in their work. This is despite the fact that such direction is essential.
In order to provide a set of rules, to deal with complex situations
and to ensure fairness and equality, a set of police
ethics has been drawn up. They are identified at 3.9 and will now be shown in more detail.
Secure and Protect: The Police will secure the safety of the public from disorder and crime with particular regard for the vulnerable and those at risk. Prevention is a primary role in this task, all of which will be achieved with respect, understanding and care. In protecting the public, the police may have to place themselves at risk.
This is considered to be the primary ethic and the reason for being of the police.
Minimum Force: In all circumstances Police will consider minimum use of authority, force and resources at the earliest opportunity.
Search for the Truth: All police investigations must be based on a search for the truth using honest techniques to collect evidence.
Fair and Reasonable: The police are entrusted with the power of discretion which must be used fairly, reasonably and responsibly, to the benefit of the public and to enhance the quality of life.
Appendix 3 (Chart)
Appendix 4 (Chart)
The correct policing style is crucial to the successful implementation
of a conflict strategy. Style and strategy act in
support of each other.
If it is accepted that organised events can be policed using the conflict management approach, then ordinary every day events in society can also be policed using the same approach. As policing is broadened from organised events to its more everyday applications in society, suitable tactics can be identified. More essentially these need to be in place in order for conflict management to succeed.
There are three decisions to be made, they are
1) Law enforcement or Peace Officers
2) Response policing or Active Policing
3) Specialist Teams or Local Teams
For ease of reference and comparison the following table [not included here] is produced, identifying advantages and disadvantages in each area.
Appendix 5 chart
Source: SEMDOC database
Statewatch European Monitoring and Documentation Centre
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: c/o MDR, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH, UK. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.