28 March 2012
PO Box 1516, London, N16 0EW. UK
tel: 00 44 (0) 20 8802 1882
fax: 00 44 (0) 20 8880 1727
Press release: Thursday 1 June 2000
EU USES LOMÉ CONVENTION TO IMPOSE REPATRIATION ON THE WORLD'S POOREST COUNTRIES - By-passing European & national parliamentary scrutiny
During the negotiations on the new Lomé Convention - £8.5 billion aid and trade for the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries - the EU imposed a draconian repatriation clause obliging the ACP countries to take back not only their own nationals, but also those of other countries ("stateless" people) and rejected asylum-seekers.
A report published in Statewatch today shows how the ACP states had little choice but to accept the "readmission" clause, despite taking the view that it had no basis in international law - a view shared by the EU Council's own legal service.
The readmission clause was not introduced until the `last minute' - at the final negotiating session on 7 December 1999.
The way the EU agreed on the imposition of the clauses on the ACP by-passed democratic scrutiny by the European and national parliaments. The UK Home Office described the draft decision as "suddenly appearing" on the agenda. The EU ignored the Amsterdam Treaty requirement that the European Parliament be consulted.
When questioned on how the measure was able to escape parliamentary scrutiny UK Home Office Minister, Barbara Roche, described it as a "non-contentious" measure. Lord Tordoff, chair of the House of Lords EU Select Committee found this response "unsatisfactory".
Tony Bunyan, editor of Statewatch, said:
"The Justice and Home Affairs council just nodded the readmission clauses through - without debate - even though the report was not meant to be on the agenda. Accountability to parliaments was simply ignored in order to railroad the ACP countries in the negotiations five days later - where it was claimed that it was the policy agreed by the JHA Council and therefore mandatory.
If parliaments and civil society had known that the EU was going to make aid and development funds for the world's poorest countries dependent on agreeing to "repatriation" they might have had something to say about it."
The feature is on the internet on:
together with two other stories from Statewatch bulletin (vol 10 no 2) concerning the by-passing of parliamentary scrutiny on EU justice and home affairs measures: 1) EU officials to decide on European Parliament's influence; 2) JHA Council authorises Europol to start negotiating the exchange of intelligence data.
- ends -
For further information:
Tony Bunyan, Statewatch editor:
00 44 (0) 208 1802 1882
Note for Editors
Statewatch is a non-profitmaking research, education and information service. It is an independent group of journalists, researchers, lawyers, academics and community activists and has a network of contributors drawn from 12 European countries.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: c/o MDR, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH, UK. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.