- Home /
- News /
- 2018 /
- September /
- EU: Official evaluation of the European Border Surveillance System (Eurosur)
EU: Official evaluation of the European Border Surveillance System (Eurosur)
                    17 September 2018
                    
                    
   Statewatch   News Online
   EU  
   Official evaluation   of the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR)
   17.9.18   
   Follow us:  |
   |  | Tweet
 | Tweet
   
The European Commission has published   an evaluation of the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR),   which recommends that the system be expanded for the "systematic   inclusion" of all border crossing points; the monitoring   of "secondary movements" of migrants within the EU;   and to develop new services and better cooperate with "third   parties", for example through "big data analysis"   of EU databases such as the Schengen Information System, the   Visa Information System and Europol's computer systems.   
See: Evaluation of the Regulation   (EU) No 1052/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council   of 22 October 2013 establishing the European Border Surveillance   System (Eurosur)   (SWD(2018) 410 final, 12 September 2018, pdf)
   And: Report from the Commission   on the evaluation of the European Border Surveillance System   (EUROSUR) (COM(2018)   632 final, 12 September 2018, pdf)
   The EU's Fundamental Rights   Agency (FRA) has also published its own evaluation of the effect   of EUROSUR on fundamental rights. The report was commissioned   to provide information for the European Commission's own evaluation   of the system. It examines Frontex's development and use of EUROSUR   and cooperation with non-EU states in the context of EUROSUR.
   The FRA report concludes   that, with regard to Frontex's development and use of the system:
      - Overall, Frontex pays   attention to implement the Eurosur Regulation in a fundamental   rights compliant manner, including also through well-designed   training. The attention given to the protection of personal data   in the Eurosur Handbook and in the Eurosur training appears effective   in reducing the risk of inadvertent data protection violations   and should therefore be continued.   
- With the further development   of Eurosur, new fundamental rights risks may emerge, for example,   in relation to the processing of photographs and videos of vessels   with migrants by maritime surveillance aircrafts or concerning   algorithms used to track suspicious vessels.   
- There are areas where   the recording of border surveillance incidents in Eurosur could   be improved, for example, by clearly marking incidents related   to search and rescue. Other adjustments in the way incidents   at the border are captured and recorded would enable the user   to have a more comprehensive picture and thus better realise   the potential of Eurosur to protect fundamental rights of migrants   and asylum seekers, including children.   
Regarding cooperation with   non-EU states ("third countries"), the FRA reviewed   "seven bilateral agreements, protocols and memoranda of   understanding concluded by EU Member States with third countries   and one regional convention, which serve as a basis for information   exchange under Eurosur."
   The report finds:
      - None of the documents   reviewed [contain wording formally contradicting fundamental   rights, but a number of them lack express safeguards to promote   a fundamental rights-compatible implementation. For future agreements,   the report suggests including safeguard clauses in the agreements   that would provide for implementation in conformity with fundamental   rights and in particular with the principle of non-refoulement;   
- Building on the good practice   of some of the reviewed documents, standard clauses reflecting   the core data protection safeguards, as set out in Council of   Europe Convention No. 108, should be considered for agreements   entailing the exchange of personal data.   
- The agreements FRA reviewed   do not contain a duty to assess the general situation in the   third country before border surveillance information is shared,   although several Member States do this in practice. FRA, therefore,   suggests more systematic and regular assessments of the situation   in the third country which data exchanges are envisaged with,   and the inclusion of regular updates on the human rights situation   in relevant third countries in the analytical layer of the European   Situational Picture.   
See: FRA: How   the Eurosur Regulation affects fundamental rights (pdf)
    Search our database for more articles and information   or subscribe   to our mailing list   for regular updates from Statewatch News Online.
 Search our database for more articles and information   or subscribe   to our mailing list   for regular updates from Statewatch News Online.