16 October 2025
The UN Convention on Cybercrime was adopted on 24 December 2024. Signatory states must introduce a range of criminal offences related to cybercrime, as well as powers for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of those offences. Rules of procedure will set out mechanisms for oversight and monitoring of the Convention, but a draft set of rules has been criticised by civil society groups for their “weak procedures”. An EU paper calls for improvements.
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
The UN Convention on Cybercrime requires that all signatory states have legislation to enable the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of cybercrime offences.
Those offences includes, for example, illegal access to informations and communications systems; or the illegal interception of electronic data.
The EU is due to sign the treaty, which will apply to areas of law within its competences. Member states, if they are to sign it, will do so separately.
A number of organisations, including Statewatch, previously warned that "the proposed Convention's use of broad or undefined concepts opens up the risk of widescale human rights violations against civil society."
Cybercrime laws have often been used by states to target human rights defenders and other critics.
Rules of procedure
Article 57 of the Convention requires that signatory states agree on rules of procedure for a "Conference of the States Parties to the Convention".
That Conference is supposed to "improve the capacity of and cooperation between States Parties to achieve the objectives set forth in this Convention and to promote and review its implementation."
Comments from the EU and its member states on the draft rules of procedure (pdf), circulated in the Council of the EU on 3 September, call for the draft rules to be amended.
The introduction to the comments says the rules should "preserve and enhance the level of involvement and participation" of "multistakeholders".
That includes "relevant non-government organizations, civil society organizations, academic institutions and the private sector."
In July, three organisations and an individual involved in the negotiations on the Convention published an open letter on the draft rules.
They warned that the draft rules included "weak procedures for monitoring, oversight, accreditation and engagement by non-governmental actors."
Documentation
The Council of the EU's proposed priorities for law enforcement access to data, covering: measures to be implemented immediately; priorities for the European Commission's upcoming "roadmap to ensure lawful and effective access to data"; and ideas for ways to "foster a constructive public discourse."
A letter signed by Statewatch and a number of other organisations calls for the European Data Protection Board to issue an opinion on the new UN Convention on Cybercrime, due to the "serious risks" it poses to human rights. Those risks include provisions that would empower national authorities to obtain access to encrypted communications and force communications service providers to retain large amounts of user data.
Cybersecurity is an issue of growing importance in EU institutions, with negotiations on a renewed Directive on network and information security underway. Documents published here show that last September, the Slovenian Presidency of the Council started a discussion on stepping up the role of law enforcement agencies in cybersecurity affairs, and this month the EU will launch a cybersecurity exercise seeking to test its "resilience" to a cyber-attack by a hostile state actor on vital economic supply chains.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.