Statewatch’s report (pdf) brings together and summarises in-depth and original research on these new technologies from partner organisations in Belgium, France, Germany, and Spain.
The report details how these so-called crime ‘prediction’ systems are increasingly embedded within and influencing police and criminal legal system authorities’ decision making and actions. This leads to people and communities being put under surveillance, subjected to questioning, identity checks and stop and search, home raids and even arrests.
These data-based, algorithmic and AI tools also affect decisions throughout the criminal legal system, from pre-trial detention to prosecution, sentencing to probation. Outside of the criminal legal system, these so called ‘predictions’ and profiles are leading to people being barred from employment, restrictions or denial of access to essential services, and even deportation.
The research also discusses and analyses the impact of these systems. It provides evidence on how marginalised groups and communities across Europe are disproportionately targeted and impacted by these systems, including Black and racialised people and communities, victims of gender-based violence, migrants, people from working-class and socio-economically deprived backgrounds and areas, and people with mental health issues.
These systems use historical data, for example from the police or criminal legal system. This reflects historic and existing biases within these institutions and within wider society. This leads to the over-policing and criminalisation of marginalised communities, particularly racialised groups, migrants, and people from low-income neighbourhoods.
The report argues that the use of these systems by police and criminal legal system authorities:
- leads to racial and socio-economic profiling, discrimination and criminalisation.
- has significant consequences for individuals’ rights, including the right to a fair trial, privacy, and freedom from discrimination.
- is deliberately secretive and opaque, meaning that people are not aware of their use. The lack of transparency surrounding the development, training and operational use of these systems is a fundamental bar to justice and accountability.
Statewatch calls for a prohibition on the use of crime ‘prediction’ and profiling systems, and for national and local legislatures to pass a legal prohibition against their use.
Griff Ferris, Researcher at Statewatch said:
“The concept of profiling and prediction has its roots in colonialism, and these new technologies are similarly being used to maintain and reinforce structural and institutional racism and violence by police and criminal legal systems.
“They are being used to provide authorities with the suspicion, the reasonable cause and the justification for police intervention: whether to monitor, stop and search, arrest – and even potentially deadly violence. The criminalisation of entire communities based on data and code has to stop. These systems must be banned.”
END
Notes to editors
Statewatch’s report, New Technology, Old Injustice: Data-driven discrimination and profiling in police and prisons in Europe (pdf) was produced in partnership with researchers working with Technopolice Belgium and La Ligue des droits humains in Belgium, La Quadrature du Net and Technopolice France in France, AlgorithmWatch in Germany and AlgoRace in Spain.
Statewatch produces and promotes critical research, policy analysis and investigative journalism to inform debates, movements and campaigns on civil liberties, human rights and democratic standards. We began operating in 1991 and are based in London.
For further information or to request an interview, please contact: comms@statewatch.org
