28 March 2012
UK government demanding
that airlines collect personal data on every passenger
- UK takes the lead in EU on meeting USA demand that every passenger is security vetted before being allowed to get on a plane; so-called "pre-boarding" intervention to exclude "inadmissibles"
This idea was originally put forward by the US authorities at a secret meeting of the EU's high-level Strategic Committee on Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum on 26 October 2001. The US delegation called for the exchange of data between EU members states and themselves to include:
"intelligence driven data (review of passenger lists), data on persons known to be inadmissible due to involvement in criminal activity (trafficking, dealing in false documents etc)"
The US said it already had a database on visa applications which contained the names of people: "involved in various kinds of activities giving rise to concern". All visa applications to enter the US are checked against the database and "signals" are entered for: green (OK), red (refuse) and yellow (where a person should be checked/vetted further).
The basic aim the USA argues is to exclude all "inadmissibles" from entering the US or the EU by extending use and access to passenger details held on APIS (Advanced Passenger Information System) to cover the entry and exits of all passengers. In particular by introducing the Australian use of APIS:
"for pre-boarding intervention especially in the case of "watch-list" persons"
Ongoing US-EU discussions make clear that the concern is not simply with countering terrorism but to exclude from travelling (this avoiding expensive and time-consuming appeals etc) people thought to have committed or suspected of having committed a crime or who are "inadmissible" (a catch-all category including refugees and asylum-seekers who may have been removed from the EU/US). As the US delegation told the meeting on 26 October 2001:
"there was a consensus in the US on the need for an effective system across the board, not targeted specifically at terrorism, but taking the events of 11 September as the trigger for developing a new approach"
Tony Bunyan, Statewatch editor, comments:
"Why didn't the government make their intention clear when the ATCS Act was rushed through parliament, they knew then that this was the measure they were going to introduce because - along with other EU officials - they had been discussing it in secret EU-US talks from October onwards.
The intention is to introduce "pre-boarding" screening of every passenger on every flight leaving a UK airport to exclude "inadmissibles" from boarding the plane (and possibly to detain or arrest them). The government intends to push this through as an anti-terrorism measure but as the discussions show it will extend to suspected criminals, refugees to be excluded and no doubt "troublemakers" going to an EU-wide protest.
If the UK, and the USA, introduce this measure other EU states and the applicant countries will be under enormous pressure to fall into line"
"Section 119 Passenger information
Section 119 amends paragraph 17 of Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000.
Subsection (2) extends the powers in paragraph (17) to Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. It allows an examining officer (a police officer, customs officer or an immigration officer) to make a request to air or ship carriers to provide information about passengers, crew or vehicles belonging to the passengers and crew on any air or ship journey to, from or within the United Kingdom. Previously the powers could only be exercised in respect of ships or aircraft arriving in Great Britain and Northern Ireland from within the CTA.
Subsection (3) extends the powers to require carriers to collect and provide information to apply to goods.
Secondary legislation will define the type of information
to be collected."
1. Statewatch News online coverage: "Secret US-EU meeting: the construction of a common EU-US area of migration, asylum and borders?": Full report
2. Guardian (6.7.02): Airlines warn of huge delays over Blunkett security plan
© Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X.Material
may be used providing the source is acknowledged. Statewatch
does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one,
the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not
responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion
of a link does not constitute an endorsement.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: 10 Queen Street Place, London EC4R 1BE. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.