28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
The Pat Finucane Centre:
Press release & for immediate release 21 August 2001
"People
can not be expected to join police while key human rights questions
remain unresolved" says rights group
The Pat Finucane Centre
reacted today to the British Government's policing implementation
plan by saying it could not recommend that people join the new
police service because outstanding concerns about human rights
have not been addressed in the new document.
"As the situation stands at present, the institutional factors that have led to human rights abuses in the past have not been adequately dealt with. In the absence of adequate change a fair-minded person joining the police would still have little or no impact on the type of policing experienced by the community" said a spokesperson for the Derry-based centre.
"While there have been some improvements, there are still a number of the key ways in which the implementation plan fails to deal with the institutional and cultural conditions within the RUC which have led to human rights abuses in the past and which could lead to their occurring again:
It will allow serving officers to continue to serve without having to take the new oath.
It recommends only the partial dissolution of the Special Branch into CID.
It provides for the Chief Constable to set policy in consultation with the Police Board, not the other way round. It is also still likely to exclude some republicans and loyalists from the Police Board and district partnerships because of past political offences. It is important that if a police force is to be acceptable in all communities then it must be properly democratically accountable. To do so it should be fully answerable to a board which includes people with the widest range of political opinions.
It relegates the District Policing Partnerships to a consultative role. This means that ultimately the force would remain unaccountable to the local community.
It allows the plastic bullet to remain in the forces arsenal, even if new recruits are to be prevented from using them for two years. If the force remains unaccountable, there is a real danger that they will be used again.
It gives the secretary of state the power to veto any inquiry ordered by the Police Board.
It provides no mechanism for inquiries into instances of human rights abuse in the past or for dealing with human rights abusers currently serving in the force.
In 1999 Pat Finucane Centre said that although there were serious problems with the Patten Report, it considered it to be a baseline which could be worked with. The Police Act 2000 and the new Implementation Plan taken together still fall far short of that baseline. It is in the interests of the whole community that the next generation grows up with a police service with proper human rights checks and balances and one that is fully transparent and democratically accountable."
ENDS
Contact: Pat Finucane Centre: 028 71 26 88 46
see also, Statewatch coverage "Policing reform in Northern Ireland:
Control or Consent?" Policing
Statewatch News online: correction to doc no 10731/1/01
Statewatch News Online: Civil society boycotts Hague conference
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.